We’re so glad that you’ve found our blog and want to know more about Peptide Synthesis. We’ve actually moved over to a new blog home that features videos, blogs, product information and more. Follow the link below to come learn more!
Would you ever consider an alternative to reversed- phase HPLC to purify your synthetic peptides? It seems like a silly question, right. And like many of you, I literally laughed at my Product Manager when he asked me this same question in my first days at Biotage.
Fast forward a few years and my answer to that question is now very different. For those of you that have followed this blog, you’ll know that I have switched to reversed-phase flash chromatography almost exclusively for my peptide purification. In today’s post, I’ll highlight some of the critical reasons that have influenced my change in mindset.
Continue reading How to purify synthetic peptides: what are the options?
Since the development of Fmoc-based solid phase peptide synthesis, a wide variety of cleavage cocktails have emerged. Each cleavage cocktail contains a unique combination of scavengers designed to prevent either side reactions mediated by the released protecting groups or the side chains themselves, or both during the peptide cleavage reaction. As the number of scientists performing peptide synthesis grows, the question “which cleavage cocktail should I use?” comes up more often than not.
In today’s post, I’ll highlight the role of of scavengers for peptides containing cysteine residues.
Continue reading Peptides containing cysteine: the role of scavengers in cleavage cocktail
Orthogonal side chain protecting groups, particularly for Fmoc-based solid phase peptide synthesis, are growing not only in diversity, but also in popularity. These protecting groups enable post-synthesis chemistry while the peptide is still on resin, often times increasing efficiency, decreasing side reactions, and generally simplifying the overall process.
I’ve already done some work with many of the commercially available orthogonally protected amino acids including allyl and alloc, Acm, and ivDde for a variety of downstream applications. In today’s post, I’ll discuss some work optimizing the removal of a 4-methoxytrityl (Mmt) group from cysteine side chains.
Continue reading How to: Measure and optimize the removal of Mmt protecting groups
Disulfide rich peptides are being identified in species of both plants and animals at increasing rates. As new molecules are discovered and disulfide bonding patterns characterized, the need for simplified chemical synthesis strategies is also increasing.
I have previously written about optimizing removal of several orthogonal side chain protecting groups including allyl, alloc, ivDde and acetamidomethyl (Acm) groups. The question that I’ll address today, though, is does the order in which the disulfide bonds are formed matter for cleaning up reactions to produce chemically synthesized disulfide rich peptides?
Continue reading Disulfide rich peptides – in which order should the disulfide bonds be formed during on-resin oxidation?
Disulfide rich peptides have gained significant attention recently due to their incredible biological stability and tolerance to epitope grafting. This class of peptides is often folded in solution, assuming the desired disulfide bond pattern correlates with the most thermodynamically stable structure. Sometimes though, especially for chemically synthesized cysteine rich peptides, this is not the case. The result is a complex mixture of peptides with varying disulfide bonding patterns and identical mass.
Using pairs of cysteine residues with matched orthogonal side chain protecting groups during chemical synthesis allows for precise regioselective control of the disulfide bond pattern on-resin, simplifying final purification steps. In today’s post, I’ll explore conditions for removing acetamidomethyl (Acm) protecting groups with simultaneous disulfide bond formation.
Continue reading Optimizing the removal of an Acm protecting group
As a chemist new to the peptide community, there are many choices that have to be made. Which coupling reagents to use? Heat or no heat to promote chemistry? And most importantly, which resin? I have talked previously about resin choices, from loading levels to swelling capacity and how they affect the synthesis outcome. But I haven’t addressed yet a fundamental feature of commercially available resins, and that’s the functional handle to which the peptide chain is conjugated.
In today’s post, I’ll describe some, and I mean only some, of the most commonly used chemical functionalities for Fmoc-based solid phase peptide synthesis and some scenarios in which you would choose one resin type over another.
Continue reading How to choose the right resin functionality for solid phase peptide synthesis
Whenever I synthesized a new peptide, I always ran a “scout run” – a small scale injection, usually with an analytical HPLC column – to both get an idea of the crude purity and also to identify a shorter, more optimal gradient for the actual purification. This strategy is still probably fine when you want to use reversed phase flash chromatography for your purification strategy, but is there a better way?
In today’s post, I’ll discuss using a scouting column to screen gradient conditions prior to peptide purification with reversed phase flash chromatography.
Continue reading How to use a scouting column for your peptide purification