Since the development of Fmoc-based solid phase peptide synthesis, a wide variety of cleavage cocktails have emerged. Each cleavage cocktail contains a unique combination of scavengers designed to prevent either side reactions mediated by the released protecting groups or the side chains themselves, or both during the peptide cleavage reaction. As the number of scientists performing peptide synthesis grows, the question “which cleavage cocktail should I use?” comes up more often than not.
In today’s post, I’ll highlight the role of of scavengers for peptides containing cysteine residues.
Cysteine with it’s sulfhydryl side chain is highly unique within the functional suite provided by the naturally occurring 20 amino acids. However these attributes can complicate the situation when handling synthetic peptides that contain cysteine. There are really two areas to be concerned about: 1) the side chain protecting group with any side reactions it may participate in and 2) the reactivity – or potential to be oxidized – of the unprotected thiol.
To demonstrate the importance of the side chain reactivity (oxidation potential in this case) I synthesized oxytocin, a 9 amino acid peptide containing two cysteines within the sequence. The biologically relevant form of the peptide contains a disulfide bond between the two Cys residues, but for this and other experiments I was only interested in the linear variant.
For the first synthesis, I used standard Fmoc-Cys(Trt)-OH and DIC/Oxyma coupling chemistry to synthesize oxytocin using my Biotage® Iniator+ Alstra™ peptide synthesizer. Once the synthesis was complete I prepared a cleavage cocktail containing 2.5% triisopropyl silane (TIS), 2.5% water, 2.5% 1,2-ethanedithiol (EDT), and 92.5% TFA, Figure 1.
The synthesis turned out great! A crude purity of >85% is nothing to bat your eyes at (ok fine, I know it’s only a 9mer…). The critical factor here is the presence of EDT whose role is to maintain cysteine residues in a reduced state during the cleavage reaction. Cysteine is prone to undergo oxidation – forming undesired inter/intramolecular disulfide bonds, or simply oxidizing to sulfenic, sulfinic, or sulfonic acids with simple exposure to air, Figure 2, and the EDT prevents these reactions.
So how bad can it really get? I synthesized oxytocin, this time incorporating Fmoc-Cys(STmp)-OH with essentially the same conditions (the number of equivalents was reduced a bit to conserve the expensive Cys amino acid). This time though I used a cleavage cocktail containing 2.5% water, 2.5% TIS and 95% TFA, Figure 3.
Yikes! For a straightforward linear peptide this is a mess! There are a few different scenarios in which this type of mess could occur. I’d expect at least some removal of the S-trimethoxyphenol (STmp) protecting groups as disulfide bonds are notoriously unstable under acidic conditions, the different oxidation states of cysteine and any combinations therein. Based on the starting materials, the following compounds could exist in this sample:
If we start extracting unique ions from the total ion chromatogram, it becomes very apparent which of these specifies exists, Figure 4.
Figure 4: Overlay of the crude TIC (black) with the extracted ions for each of the listed compounds. The predominant TIC peaks (and associated UV peaks) can easily be assigned to 7 of the 9 listed compounds.While many of these modifications can likely be reversed, the fact remains that the desired, unmodified peptide is the least abundant of the species present (black XIC, orange arrow Figure 3). Leaving the reducing agent out of the cleavage cocktail has now added several chemical and potentially additional purification steps to the workflow required to recover pure oxytocin product. Lesson learned!
How have you modified your cleavage cocktails to prevent cleavage-related side reactions?
If you have found this blog and content informative or have any suggestions for topics, please share your feedback and complete our survey. I’d love to hear from you!